{"id":6072,"date":"2018-05-15T20:13:18","date_gmt":"2018-05-16T03:13:18","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.vicnhs.bc.ca\/?p=6072"},"modified":"2018-05-15T20:15:56","modified_gmt":"2018-05-16T03:15:56","slug":"may-15-evening","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.vicnhs.bc.ca\/?p=6072","title":{"rendered":"May 15 evening"},"content":{"rendered":"<div>\n<p style=\"text-align: left;\"><strong>2018 May 15 evening<\/strong><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: left;\"><strong>&nbsp;<\/strong><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: left;\"><strong>&nbsp;&nbsp; <\/strong>Jeremy Tatum writes:&nbsp; This afternoon I saw a  <strong>&#8220;Ringlet&#8221;<\/strong><strong>&nbsp; <\/strong><strong><em>Coenonympha tullia <\/em>  <\/strong>in the grassy fields just inland from Island View Beach.&nbsp; Viewers of this site will know that I have hitherto preferred the British name,  <strong>Large Heath<\/strong>, for this butterfly, on the bases that it is not closely related to the British species known as The Ringlet, and that it carries no &#8220;ringlet&#8221; markings on its wings.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: left;\">&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: left;\">&nbsp; However, I may have to withdraw my objections.&nbsp; I have discovered that when the butterfly was first recognized as a British species in 1795, it was given the name Manchester Ringlet, and a few years later it was renamed the Small   Ringlet, to distinguish it from the much larger Ringlet.&nbsp; However, it was soon realized that it was much more closely related to another British  <em>Coenonympha<\/em>, and the two <em>Coenonympha<\/em>s<em> <\/em>became the Small Heath and the Large Heath.&nbsp; Since the first English name the species had was the Manchester Ringlet, followed by the Small Ringlet, I can no longer insist that this butterfly   is not a ringlet.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: left;\">&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: left;\">&nbsp; There are still some problems.&nbsp; Over its large Holarctic range, this butterfly has an enormous variation in its markings.&nbsp; While some populations have several strong ringlet marks, our own population on Vancouver Island has no   sign at all of any ringlet mark, which does make it a bit difficult to call it a ringlet!&nbsp;&nbsp; And how many species are really involved? &nbsp;Is it just one widely-distributed species, with several named subspecies or forms?&nbsp; Or should it be split into several species?&nbsp;   This seems to be largely a matter of taste!&nbsp; And what adjective should we place in front of our own population here?&nbsp; &nbsp;&nbsp;&#8217;Fraid I don&#8217;t know the answer to that.&nbsp; In any case, it was nice to see one of them today.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: left;\">&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: left;\">&nbsp; This evening on the top of Christmas Hill there were several  <strong>Painted Ladies<\/strong> , a <strong>Red Admiral<\/strong>, a <strong>Propertius Duskywing<\/strong>, and two  <strong>Grey Hairstreaks.<\/strong><strong>&nbsp; <\/strong>The latter were flying around a Garry Oak, often settling on it for minutes at a time, wings wide open, at about head height, enabling very close, prolonged views.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: left;\">&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p><em>&nbsp;&nbsp; <\/em>Jeff Gaskin writes:&nbsp; A <strong>Mourning Cloak<\/strong> flew by me on Wascana Street, the Gorge area, today May 15.<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: left;\">&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; We still have a queue of bumblebees waiting, while we struggle to identify them.&nbsp; We&#8217;ll get them up eventually.&nbsp; And I believe we have a bunch of goodies from Nanoose Bay awaiting our attention.&nbsp; Will have to look at them tomorrow.<\/p>\n<p>  <\/p>\n<\/p><\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>2018 May 15 evening &nbsp; &nbsp;&nbsp; Jeremy Tatum writes:&nbsp; This afternoon I saw a &#8220;Ringlet&#8221;&nbsp; Coenonympha tullia in the grassy fields just inland from Island View Beach.&nbsp; Viewers of this site will know that I have hitherto preferred the British name, Large Heath, for this butterfly, on the bases that it is not closely related [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[8],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-6072","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-invertebrate-alert"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.vicnhs.bc.ca\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/6072","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.vicnhs.bc.ca\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.vicnhs.bc.ca\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.vicnhs.bc.ca\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.vicnhs.bc.ca\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=6072"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.vicnhs.bc.ca\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/6072\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.vicnhs.bc.ca\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=6072"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.vicnhs.bc.ca\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=6072"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.vicnhs.bc.ca\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=6072"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}